Memorial Lecture Devoted to Prof Dr Vojin Dimitrijević Held

October 6, 2020

The memorial lecture devoted to Prof Dr Vojin Dimitrijević, a law professor, intellectual, co-founder and long-standing Director of the Belgrade Centre for Human Rights, was held on Zoom on 2 October 2020.

The lecture honouring Vojin Dimitrijević was delivered by Prof Dr Žarko Puhovski, Professor Emeritus of the Zagreb University College of Philosophy. Vojin Dimitrijević passed away in Belgrade on 5 October 2012. The participants in the event said that Serbia’s society and public arena have sorely been missing Vojin’s voice, the voice of reason and tolerance,  for eight years now.

The recording of Prof Puhovski’s lecture, entitled “Idiotism of Human Rights” is available on BCHR’s YouTube channel.

BCHR’s Campaign against Fake News on social media

October 2, 2020

Fake-NEWS_azil-01BCHR in Septemeber launched an online campaign against the many fake news about the number of migrants and their alleged large-scale settlement in Serbia, the “privileges” they enjoy, and many other untrue, incomplete or unverified information about them.

The campaign aimed to provide the public, especially people who get most of their news from social networks, with accurate information about the migrant population and its size, and to familiarise them with national and international legal documents governing refugee law and migration.

The campaign was launched on social networks and included a series of posts in the form of electronic posters or brochure on BCHR’s Facebook, Twitter and Instagram profiles. The posts were short and simple and summarised various facts, regulations and statistics, providing the readers with links to sources where they could check the information or familiarise themselves with the issues in greater detail.

Serbian Government and Protector of Citizens Should End Their Oath of Silence on COVID-19 Deaths and Infections

 

The Protector of Citizens and the Serbian Government have turned a deaf ear BCHR’s attempts to draw alert them to the alarming claims by BIRN published in June 2020 – that the number of COVID-19 deaths and infections in Serbia was much higher than the Crisis Headquarters had officially been publishing.

Back in late May, the BCHR requested of the Serbian Government to provide it with access to the minutes of the COVID-19 Crisis Headquarters sessions, the decision on the establishment of the Crisis Headquarters and information on all members of this body and their functions. It sent two follow-up requests in June 2020. On 22 June 2020, the BCHR filed an initiative with the Protector of Citizens to launch a review of the work of the Ministry of Health, specifically, the management of the COVID-19 Information System, emphasising, in particular, that any concealment of data on the health of Serbia’s population could result in irreparable and incalculable harm.

Neither the Serbian Government nor the Protector of Citizens have responded to BCHR’s requests for over three months now.

On 30 September 2020, the media quoted the Protector of Citizens, Mr. Zoran Pašalić, as saying that he was looking into whether there were “grounds to launch a review of the relevant institutions”. It is absolutely unclear what exactly he is waiting for, i.e. what he considers “grounds to launch a review” – one would have thought that the data published by BIRN and the public anxiety they caused, the relevant authorities’ decision to stop informing the population on COVID-19 deaths and infections by city and region, the recent statements by Crisis Headquarters member Dr. Predrag Kon, the dissatisfaction of doctors within the United against COVID protest et al would suffice. Unfortunately, this is not the first time the public has had to wait for the reaction of the Protector of Citizens to human rights violations for months. If, indeed, it ever came.  

 

 

BCHR Holds Webinar on Recognition of Refugees’ Qualifications

September 30, 2020

Capture webinarWith the support of UNHCR in Serbia, the Belgrade Centre for Human Rights (BCHR) on 30 September 2020held a webinar on the recognition of the refugees’ qualifications. The webinar aimed to familiarise the participants with the process of recognising the qualifications of refugees in Serbia based on the successful practice of the Council of Europe’s Education Department.

The event was opened by BCHR Executive Director Sonja Tošković, who recalled the importance of this issue for the integration of refugees in Serbian society. Panellist Samir Hećo of the CoE Education Department presented the European Qualifications Passport for Refugees (EQPR), while panellist Letizia Brambilla Pisoni from the CIMEA – National Academic Recognition Information Centre (NARIC) in Italy talked about the experiences of applying the EQPR in that country. The webinar was moderated by Jelena Ilić, BCHR’s Senior Refugee Integration Adviser.

The webinar was attended by 46 representatives of state institutions, the Commissariat for Refugees and Migration, the Serbian ENIC-NARIC, regional school administrations, international organisations, the UNHCR Office in Belgrade and local CSOs, who contributed to the active discussion.

The panellists presented the EQPR, a document that lists the applicants’ highest education qualifications obtained, language skills and work experience. The initiative helps refugees restore their lives in countries they plan on settling in and in which they enjoy legal protection, providing them with the possibility of assessing their qualifications even when they do not have all the documents proving them. The EQPR thus supports the implementation of Article VII of the 1997 Lisbon Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region, which facilitates recognition of refugees’ qualifications even in the absence of all the documentation. The CoE elaborated the Convention together with UNESCO.

The refugees can use the EQPR when they wish to enrol in college, enter further studies and/or seek employment, ad apply for scholarships. The recognition process involves three steps: assessment, explanation and practical use of the passport in further integration. Part two includes information on the legal status of the document and a brief description of the project. Part three contains information on the next steps, contact details of state authorities and agencies, job-seeking steps and applications for continuing education. Although it does not constitute formal recognition, authorisation or licence to engage in a particular profession, the EQPR provides credible information that may be relevant to applications for jobs, internships, qualification courses and enrolment in college. The document is valid for five years. The goal is to provide refugees and migrants with the opportunity to improve their language skills, continue their studies, improve their employment prospects or apply for the formal recognition or approval of their education.

The webinar provided the participants with the opportunity to discuss cooperation and implementation of projects to improve the recognition of refugees’ qualifications in Serbia and other issues.

BCHR Issues Report on Human Rights in Serbia in the January-June 2020 Period

August 15, 2020

Capture HRReport Jan-June 2020The Belgrade Centre for Human Rights (BCHR) today published its Report on the State of Human Rights in Serbia in the first half of 2020, focusing on respect for human rights during the state of emergency. The Report concludes that democracy in Serbia has continued deteriorating and lists grave violations of human rights, particularly as of 15 March 2020, when the state of emergency was imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Decision on the Proclamation of the State of Emergency and all the subsequent measures were adopted by the executive rather than the legislative authorities. Resort to this possibility, although provided for by the Constitution subsidiarily and in exceptional cases, was unjustified. Grave violations of constitutionally guaranteed human and minority rights, including disproportionate restrictions of the freedom of movement, occurred during the state of emergency; numerous examples and accounts of citizens who were beaten up, arrested and detained for violating self-isolation measures they had not been properly notified of were registered.

The Constitutional Court was apparently hibernating during the state of emergency. Sixty-seven days passed from the day the state of emergency was imposed until it rendered its first decision. It only reacted publicly to criticisms of its dormancy. By mid-May, it received a total of 51 initiatives challenging the constitutionality and legality of regulations enacted during the state of emergency: 10 questioned the constitutionality of the Decision on the Proclamation of the State of Emergency and 41 the constitutionality and legality of other regulations adopted since 15 March 2020.

The media situation continued deteriorating in the first half of the year. The number of attacks and pressures against journalists increased, as did the authorities’ rhetoric against impartial outlets. The Government Conclusion of 28 March allowing only the COVID Crisis Headquarters headed by the Prime Minister to release any pandemic-related information was tantamount to centralisation of information and censorship. Violations of media freedoms climaxed with the arrest of Nova portal’s reporter Ana Lalilć on 2 April for causing public anxiety by reporting on the problems in the Vojvodina Clinical Centre during the pandemic.

International institutions and organisations alerted to grave problems with respect to democracy, rule of law and reforms in Serbia in the first half of the year. In its Non-paper, the European Commission noted serious delays and the need to accelerate reforms in the key areas of judicial independence, the fight against corruption, media freedom, the domestic handling of war crimes and the fight against organised crime, specifying that the pandemic created additional challenges. In its Freedom in the World 2020 Report, Freedom House classified Serbia as a hybrid regime, citing data coinciding with BCHR’s annual human rights reports.

The judiciary, as a separate branch of government, did not fulfil the standards and expectations related to the improvement of its efficiency, fairness of access to justice and protection of civil rights. Introduction of “Skype” trials during the state of emergency, denying the defendants a public explanation of the decisions against them, and case law discrepancies resulting from the imposition of different penalties for the same offences committed during the state of emergency, further eroded legal insecurity and public trust in the judiciary.

The Protector of Citizens, the Commissioner for the Protection of Equality, the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection and the Anti-Corruption Agency were not particularly active in the first half of the year either, especially during the state of emergency, when citizens needed and, indeed, expected greater protection. The parliament’s failure to promptly initiate the procedure to elect the new Equality Commissioner was particularly concerning: this institution has not been performing its duties conferred by law to protect the citizens from discrimination since May, when the prior Commissioner’s term in office expired.

The Report on Human Rights in Serbia in the January-June 2020 Period is available HERE.

This publication is the product of our team, comprising Lazar Stefanović, Snežana Lazarević, Vladica Ilić, Luka Mihajlović, Vesna Petrović, Dušan Pokuševski, Ivan Protić, Goran Sandić, Anja Stefanović, Milena Ančić, Bojan Stojanović, Aleksandar Marković, Ana Trifunović i Duška Tomanović.

The publication of this Report has been supported by the United Nations Human Rights Team in Serbia. The Report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations.

New FRA quarterly report – Migration: Key fundamental rights concerns – Quarterly bulletin 3 – 2020

July 31, 2020

Capture FRAEuropean Union Agency for Fundamental Rights has published quarterly bulletin no 3 for 2020: Migration: Key fundamental rights concerns for the period from the 1 April to 30 June 2020. The report collects data on the state of fundamental rights of persons arriving to the EU member states. It lights on main trends in the majority of the EU member states in the field of asylum and migration. Additionally to the EU member states, the report gives up date on the key fundamental rights concerns in this area in the Republic of Serbia and North Macedonia.

Quarterly Bulletin no 3 mostly focused on key challenges in the context of COVID-19 pandemic including legal framework changes, restriction of movement, hindered access to the asylum procedure, overcrowding of the accommodation facilities, protection of children as well as hate speech and violence. Report points to slowdowns in the number of asylum seekers due to health measures and restrictions in traveling despite that the enforcement of measures was ease off to certain extent.

BCHR contributed to the report with analyses on the state of affairs in the Republic of Serbia. The report stresses that the Asylum Office resumed procedural actions and that the abolishment of the Government’s Decision on closure of all border crossing for entering into Republic of Serbia in May which led to opening of border crossings and restart of commercial flights. Attention is given to the physical abuse of unaccompanied children in the Asylum Centre Bogovađa and Order of the Ministry of Health from 7 May.